Tag: QMS

Posted on by

What Are EU Reference Labs for IVDs?

EU Reference Labs for IVD’s – explained

In vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs) play a vital role in providing essential information for the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of diseases.  IVDs must comply with the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation (IVDR – Regulation (EU) 2017/746) to be placed on the European Union (EU) market.

The IVDR introduced the concept of EU Reference Laboratories (EURLs) for IVDs. EURLs are specialised laboratories designated by the European Commission, to provide scientific and technical expertise for specific types of high-risk IVDs. The designation and responsibilities of EURLs are outlined in Article 100 of the IVDR and more details are laid out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/944.

Designation & Responsibilities of EURLs

For a laboratory to be designated as an EURL by the European Commission, it must:

  • Demonstrate appropriate expertise and experience in the relevant field
  • Have adequate staff with appropriate qualifications
  • Possess necessary equipment and reference materials
  • Show impartiality and independence from commercial interests
  • Comply with ISO/IEC 17025 and other relevant standards
  • Have appropriate quality management systems in place

Once designated, EURLs’ tasks include the following:

  • Performance Verification – EURLs verify the performance claims of class D IVDs by conducting laboratory tests on samples provided by manufacturers i.e., EURLs carry out tests on each manufactured batch of devices.
  • Common Specifications Development – EURLs contribute to the development of common specifications and technical guidance for specific types of devices.
  • Technical Assistance – EURLs provide scientific advice and technical assistance to national authorities, notified bodies and manufacturers.
  • Reference Materials Management – EURLs establish, manage, and make available reference materials and methods for high-risk IVDs.
  • Coordination Role – EURLs coordinate a network of national reference laboratories to harmonize testing methodologies and practices across the EU.
  • Research and Innovation – EURLs contribute to research and innovation in their specific areas of expertise.

Types of IVDs Subject to EURL Assessment

The EURLs verify the performance claims and carry out batch testing on high-risk (Class D) IVDs:

  • Devices which detect the presence of / exposure to, a transmissible agent in blood / blood components / cells tissues / organs / any of their derivatives, to assess their suitability for transfusion / transplantation / cell administration.
  • Devices which detect the presence of / exposure to, a transmissible agent that causes a life-threatening disease with high propagation risk.
  • Devices which determine the infectious load of a life-threatening disease, where monitoring is critical in the process of patient management.
  • Devices for blood grouping, which determine any of the following markers:
    • ABO system [A (ABO1), B (ABO2), AB (ABO3)]
    • Rhesus system [RH1 (D), RHW1, RH2 (C), RH3 (E), RH4 (c), RH5 (e)]
    • Kell system [KEL1 (K)]
    • Kidd system [JK1 (Jka), JK2 (Jkb)]
    • Duffy system [FY1 (Fya), FY2 (Fyb)]

Impact on the Industry

EURLs for IVDs have an impact on both IVD manufacturers and notified bodies.

Manufacturers of class D IVDs must submit samples of their device to an appropriately designated EURL for the EURL to verify performance claims and compliance to any common specifications. Manufacturers must then incorporate any feedback into their technical documentation. Prior to release of a batch of any Class D IVDs, manufacturers must wait for EURLs to confirm they have completed their tests.

Notified bodies will need to consult with EURLs when assessing certain high-risk IVDs and factor in EURL’s opinions into their assessment decisions. Notified bodies will also have to maintain communication with EURLs for post-market surveillance.

Implementation Challenges

Although the IVDR became fully applicable on 26 May 2022, implementation of the regulation has not necessarily been smooth. The timelines to which certain devices must be compliant to the IVDR have been extended more than once and establishing a EURL network has been challenging. Resources have been restrained, as building the necessary infrastructure and hiring the appropriate expertise has required significant investment and coordination.

As a result, the European Commission adopted a phased approach to EURL designation and until EURLs are fully operational for all relevant device categories, interim procedures have been established for the conformity assessment of class D IVDs. MDCG 2021-4 provides guidance on how EURLs should be integrated into the conformity assessment process when designated.

Current State of Play

The European Commission have designated the following 5 EURLs by the implementing act Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2713

Designated EU reference laboratoryScope of designation Class D devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of:
Consortium managed by Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS), Spain and composed of: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Spain Hospital Universitario la Paz, Spain Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, SpainHerpesvirus infection Infection with bacterial agents
Consulting Químico Sanitario SLU (CQS), SpainHerpesvirus infection Infection with bacterial agents
EU Referenzlabor für In-vitro-Diagnostika am Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI-IVD), Germany Hepatitis or retrovirus infection Respiratory virus infection
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), SpainHepatitis or retrovirus infection Herpesvirus infection  Infection with bacterial agents
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB (RISE), SwedenRespiratory virus infection

These EURLs took up their tasks in the conformity assessment of devices on 1 October 2024.

In February 2025, the European Commission launched a further call for more applications to be submitted by Member States on behalf of their candidate laboratories for designation of EURLs. This call will be conducted in 2 waves.

The 1st wave is for the following categories of class D devices:

  • detection or quantification of markers of arbovirus infection
  • detection or quantification of markers of parasite infection
  • detection of blood grouping markers

Laboratories must submit applications to their Member State by 15 April 2025 (note: this date is indicative and laboratories should check with their specific Member State).

Member States must forward applications to the Commission by 6 June 2025.

The 2nd wave is for any of the following 8 categories of class D devices:

  • detection or quantification of markers of hepatitis or retrovirus infection 
  • detection or quantification of markers of herpesvirus infection 
  • detection or quantification of markers of infection with bacterial agents
  • detection or quantification of markers of arbovirus infection
  • detection or quantification of markers of respiratory virus infection
  • detection or quantification of markers of infection with haemorrhagic fever viruses or other biosafety level 4 viruses
  • detection or quantification of markers of parasite infection
  • detection of blood grouping markers

Laboratories must submit applications to their Member State by 15 January 2026 (note: this date is indicative and laboratories should check with their specific Member State).

Member States must forward applications to the Commission by 15 April 2026.

Conclusion

EURLs play a critical role in ensuring certain Class D IVDs are safe and effective. Although there are interim procedures in place for the conformity assessment of Class D IVDs, the IVD industry will benefit from the certainty of having enough designated EURLs to cover all categories of Class D devices.

Let’s hope this new call for further applications for designation of EURLs will provide additional resources the EU IVD industry desperately needs.

If you’re looking for a regulatory partner to offer compliance advise and support, get in touch with IVDeology today to begin your new partnership or email us at [email protected]

What Are EU Reference Labs for IVDs?
IVD & MDR NEWS

What Are EU Reference Labs for IVDs?

Posted on by Stuart Angell

EU Reference Labs for IVD’s – explained In vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs) play …

A review of the MHRA Fee Consultation
IVD & MDR NEWS

A review of the MHRA Fee Consultation

Posted on by Stuart Angell

Executive Summary The MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) held a public consu…

eQMS is Like a Chocolate Selection box: Choosing the Right Quality Management System
IVD & MDR NEWS

eQMS is Like a Chocolate Selection box: Choosing the Right Quality Management System

Posted on by Stuart Angell

Choosing an electronic Quality Management System (eQMS) might not sound like it has much in common w…

Understanding Companion Diagnostics: A Key to Personalised Medicine
IVD & MDR NEWS

Understanding Companion Diagnostics: A Key to Personalised Medicine

Posted on by Stuart Angell

The first companion diagnostic (CDx) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 19…

IVDeology now offering QMS Hosting Services!
IVD & MDR NEWS

IVDeology now offering QMS Hosting Services!

Posted on by Stuart Angell

One of the biggest challenges we see is the adoption of an effective Quality Management System (QMS)…

BIVDA Member IVDeology excited to Sponsor 2025 IVDR Event
IVD & MDR NEWS

BIVDA Member IVDeology excited to Sponsor 2025 IVDR Event

Posted on by Stuart Angell

IVDeology are excited to announce our first sponsorship of a BIVDA event, the 2025 annual 2-day IVDR…

You agree to receive email communication from us by submitting this form and understand that your contact information will be stored with us.

Posted on by

A review of the MHRA Fee Consultation

Executive Summary

The MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) held a public consultation on proposed amendments to its statutory fees, to ensure ongoing cost recovery. The consultation ran from August 29, 2024, to October 24, 2024. The majority of respondents (including stakeholders, from UK Approved Bodies, Trade Associations, Manufactures and the public) disagreed with the new medical devices registration fee, hence the MHRA have decided to proceed with the wider fees uplift and continue exploring options for this fee. The implementation date for the proposed changes to the wider fees uplift is early Q1 2025/26.

Introduction

The MHRA regulates medicines, medical devices, and blood components for transfusion in the UK. It operates on a full cost-recovery basis, ensuring financial sustainability and service delivery. Fees are updated regularly to reflect the cost of regulatory activities, including staff costs and corporate overheads. The MHRA, as a department of the UK government, need to be self-sustaining financially. Any activity they perform, and they are critical to the monitoring of medicines, medical devices and IVDs on the UK market, needs to be paid for by cost recovery initiatives, such as those summarised in the consultation document.

Evaluation of Responses

The document evaluates responses to the five proposals:

  1. Proposal 1: Increase statutory fees to ensure continued cost recovery. Most respondents did not agree, citing high costs and impact on SMEs, particularly in the case of the new proposed medical devices registration fee. The MHRA plans to proceed with the wider fees uplift but did refer to existing payment easements for small companies and payment waivers for SMEs for certain fees. However, this does not apply to medical devices or IVDs.
  2. Proposal 2: Amend the Medical Device Registration fee to include post-market work costs. Most respondents disagreed, citing financial burden on businesses, especially SMEs. The MHRA will continue exploring options for this fee and in the meantime, the existing one-off medical devices registration fee will remain but get the indexation increase being applied to all other existing fees (i.e. raising it from £240 to £261).
  3. Proposal 3: Create a new service for regulatory advice meetings for medical devices. Most respondents agreed, but requested more details on scope, format, and timelines. Questions were also raised with regards to the MHRA’s advice versus that of Notified/Approved Bodies, and the risks if advice was contradictory. The MHRA plans to proceed with this proposal.
  4. Proposal 4: Amend fee models for existing services and remove obsolete fees. Most respondents did not have an opinion but agreed in principle and requested more information be provided. The MHRA plans to proceed with this proposal.
  5. Proposal 5: Update the legal definition of a “standard variation” application for homeopathic products. Most respondents did not have an opinion, and the MHRA plans to proceed with this proposal.

Unintended Impacts on Protected Characteristics

The MHRA assessed the proposals for potential unintended discrimination. Most respondents did not have an opinion, but some raised concerns about the impact on product availability for rare conditions and minority groups. The MHRA believes the risk of unintended discrimination is low.

The implementation of this proposal will also see an increase to UK Approved Body fees, which will increase the financial burden on anyone who potentially uses the international recognition route or UKCA marking for classes B, C and D.

The biggest challenge for IVD manufacturers was the proposal to change how fees were applied for device registrations (proposal 2). In the consultation, a change of fees from £240 (one-off fee) to £210 per GMDN code registration (annually) was originally proposed. This would substantially increase the year on year costs of maintaining IVDs on the UK market (often at an increase of up to 5,000%) Whist the increase continued to be considered, the existing one-off medical devices registration fee will remain but get the indexation increase being applied to all other existing fees (i.e. raising it from £240 to £261) will occur later this year (exact date unconfirmed).

Closing thoughts

In summary, we understand that cost have to be recovered for the services the MHRA provide, and in reality, the fees for the UK are lower than many key regulatory markets (e.g. USA). However, in an aid to ensuring the UK continues to have early access to world leading and innovative products, the UK needs to be shaped into an attractive destination for IVD manufacturers in the short term. A substantial increase in medical devices fees, disproportionate to market size, would not support this message.

We will continue to engage with our customers on the outcome from the consultation and potential impacts of this change, as well as continue to engage with BIVDA, our trade association, to work with the MHRA to find a positive way forward.

IVDeology provides expert regulatory consultancy for anyone taking advantage of the UK’s current regulatory pathway, or planning for UKCA transition. We can help you build your regulatory strategy to consider the impact of UK international recognition, and support non-UK manufacturers place product on market utilising our UKRP service.

Book a call with us to discuss your regulatory challenges or questions and see how IVDeology can help you.

Posted on by

eQMS is Like a Chocolate Selection box: Choosing the Right Quality Management System

Choosing an electronic Quality Management System (eQMS) might not sound like it has much in common with picking out a chocolate bar, but in many ways, the process is surprisingly similar. Both involve sifting through a variety of options to find the perfect fit for your specific needs and tastes. Just like when you’re deciding between dark, milk, or white chocolate, selecting the right eQMS requires considering your unique preferences, goals, and requirements.

Do you prioritize smoothness and simplicity, or do you need something with a bit more complexity and richness? In this blog, we’ll explore how the decision-making process for an eQMS mirrors the sweet (and sometimes overwhelming) experience of choosing your favourite chocolate bar. So, let’s unwrap the similarities and help you make a decision that’s both satisfying and beneficial

The eQMS Landscape

Here’s an interesting fact, just like chocolate, there are over 100 different versions of eQMS software available today! The remarkable thing is that you can build a compliant quality management system with any of these tools. You could even create one using basic platforms like SharePoint or Google Drive!

What Makes the Difference?

So what separates one eQMS from another? Different systems offer varying functionalities:

  • Some leverage AI (artificial intelligence) capabilities
  • Others focus on simplicity
  • Many interconnect with other business functions

It’s all about understanding what’s right for you and your organization. Quality management system software provides both a tool and a framework to build your QMS around. The work and effort required to build a QMS is largely driven by your specific company needs.

The Value of Expertise

This is where consultants become valuable. Through their careers, consultants experience different types of QMS systems built by different organisations at various stages of development. We can help you determine not only where to begin but also where you may want to go in the future. Our perspective and expertise can support you in developing a long-term strategy for quality planning and QMS implementation.

Our Recommended Options

While hundreds of options exist, here are three QMS software providers we regularly work with:

  1. Cognidox  – This is the system we use to build our own ISO-compliant QMS. It offers simple setup, ease of use, and scalability based on your company’s needs rather than forcing you into a predefined structure.
  2. TraceX – A robust alternative with its own strengths and considerations.
  3. ISMS – Another effective system that works well for certain organizational needs.

Both TraceX and ISMS work excellently, each with positives and negatives. The key is understanding what’s important to you, and we’d be happy to spend time with you to discuss these points. What works wonders for one organisation might not be suitable—or even detrimental—for another. This largely depends on each organisation’s unique needs, processes, and goals – just like how someone absolutely adores a coconut Bounty, whereas someone else, not so much!

Finding Your Perfect Match

Sometimes you want a Bounty, sometimes a Snickers, and sometimes you’re not even sure what you’re craving. But what you don’t want to do is settle for something medicore.

For more information on what’s right for you and how to effectively build a quality management system, get in touch with us on [email protected]. We can discuss these processes in more detail and help build you an effective, right-first-time quality management system tailored to your needs, after all, we maintain and work within our own QMS and know that a quality management system is for life, not just for your audits!

Posted on by

Understanding Companion Diagnostics: A Key to Personalised Medicine

The first companion diagnostic (CDx) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998 with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) following with approval 2 years later focussed on the cancer treatment drug Herceptin. Since then, the rise of precision medicine has played an increasing part in eliminating the trial-and-error approach to identifying effective treatments for individual patients ensuring that therapies are tailored to their unique biological characteristics.

What Are Companion Diagnostics?

Companion diagnostics are in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests (or may be an imaging tool), that provide critical information for the safe and effective use of a corresponding drug or biological product. These tests are co-developed with a therapeutic drug and are essential in determining whether a patient will benefit from a specific treatment, be at risk for severe side effects, or require adjustments in their therapy to achieve optimal results.

The labelling of a CDx must include the specific drug it was developed for and likewise the labelling of the drug must indicate the use of the CDx for prescription of the drug.

The US FDA approach to CDx Submission

In the US, the FDA is the central authority and requires that the drug and device are submitted for review and approval at the same time. Thus, the device and drug are developed at the same time and if possible, the device should be used as the Clinical Trial Assay (CTA). The therapeutic drug and it’s proposed CDx need Investigational Drug Application (IND) and Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) submissions and approvals before investigational clinical studies can commence.

During the development process the drug developer will be able to request meetings with the Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the device developer will be able to meet with the Centre for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) via the Q-Submission process. For each of these meetings the respective developer should make it clear that they are co-developing the CDx and it is always useful to request a representative from the other centre to attend for awareness.

In the past the majority of CDx have been submitted and approved via the Pre-Market Approval process (PMA) and are classified as Class III devices. However, in 2024, the FDA announced plans to reclassify many Class IIIs to be Class II and enable manufacturers to submit for market authorisation via the 510K route.

The EU approach to CDx submission

In the EU, CDx are Class C following the classification rule 3(f) under the IVD Regulation 2017/746 and the key difference to the US process is the consultation process between the Notified Body of the device manufacturer and the EMA. The Notified Body will assess the technical documentation of the CDx and when that is complete, they will then consult with EMA for the final assessment alongside the drug file. This secondary process can add around 6 to 8 months to the approval process and needs to be planned carefully to allow sufficient time for market authorisations.

As with the US process, the CDx should be used as the CTA as early as possible, and the clinical use of the assay is often seen as an interventional clinical study requiring complex and lengthy applications to the separate member state competent authorities for approval.

The Future of Companion Diagnostics

Since the first CDx was approved by the FDA in 1998, there are now over 200 cleared or approved listed by the FDA. IVDeology Ltd is seeing the development of companion diagnostics growing alongside advancements in genomics and biotechnology. As our understanding of the genetic and molecular basis of diseases expands, manufacturers have the ability to create more precise and effective diagnostic tests, leading to better patient outcomes and more efficient healthcare systems.

Conclusion

Companion diagnostics are leading the way in the field of personalized medicine. By ensuring that treatments are tailored to the individual needs of patients, these diagnostics not only improve the efficacy and safety of therapies but also pave the way for a more personalized approach to healthcare. As technology continues to evolve, the role of companion diagnostics will undoubtedly become even more integral to modern medicine.

IVDeology Ltd can support small pharmaceutical developers understand the CDx requirements to enable clear and concise discussions with your identified device developers. Likewise we can support CDx developers understand the requirement for consultation with the FDA and the pathway to market approval.

Posted on by

IVDeology now offering QMS Hosting Services!

One of the biggest challenges we see is the adoption of an effective Quality Management System (QMS) too late in the design and development process of a medical device, especially for start up companies who don’t have the internal resources, funds or time to do so!

Great ideas and great products being delayed due to not having the quality and technical documentation required to meet regulatory requirements. Without a QMS, you don’t have a product! But we all know the challenge that companies face when they’re met with the dreaded question of ‘do you have a Quality management system?’

QMS Challenges we see faced by small businesses: 

  • Understanding the regulatory requirements – these go hand in hand
  • Finding the right QMS offering – this can be size, costing, adaptability, and so on!
  • Dedicating time and resources to the QMS
  • Developing Quality and Regulatory expertise 
  • Affordability of effective solutions 

Developing a QMS can be a significant challenge for a small business. It can be expensive and time consuming. Most QMS providers provide basic templates and technical support, but it takes time and specialist knowledge to build an effective QMS to allow business growth and regulatory approval. And on the other hand, some offer way too much for what small companies actually need right away, meaning you’ve overpaid for way more than you need, which can lead to being overwhelmed and frustrated.

So what are the benefits of a QMS? 

  • Meets regulatory requirements – again, they go hand in hand
  • Enables growth and expansion 
  • Improves operational efficiency 
  • Reduces product and business risk 
  • Build customer confidence 
  • Offers a competitive advantage 

Read our previous blog: “A QMS isn’t just for IVDR conformity assessment…. it’s for life!” to learn more about how implementing and maintaining a QMS that works for you is so important

 IVDeology have a proven track record supporting our customers build, host and maintain a quality management system specific to their industry: 

  • ISO 9001 – General quality management system, ideal for service providers 
  • ISO 13485 – Specific for Medical Devices and In vitro diagnostic manufacturers 
  • ISO 17025 – Quality Management System for testing laboratories 

Our aim is to provide a common-sense approach to quality compliance, and we understand that start up companies cannot afford all the bells and whistles for a fully fledged QMS that they just can’t and won’t need to utilise yet.

We now offer eQMS hosting, a solution that we feel every small business can benefit from. But what is it?

IVDeology use Cognidox, an eQMS platform that allows us to build our system round our own needs, we can create templates, process with change controls, manage procedures and personalise it to what we deem important for us.

We have the ability to host your company within our eQMS system, a safe and secure, private account within Cognidox that allows you to begin with 1-2 members to start building your Quality management system.

Benefits of us hosting you within Cognidox:

  • You have access to all our templates for documents and procedures, and these can be tailored to you and your product(s) and processes
  • We use Cognidox! You can receive training and a demo of the systems, and you can add on adhoc support from us if you need it later on
  • It can be as basic as you like for what you need now to comply with the regulations
  • Buildable and manageable, both for content but also adding users if and when your team grows
  • You can capture your QMS and move it over to your own system whenever you decide you can begin to host your own eQMS internally – so you won’t lose any data or have to start again
  • Secure, reliable system that auditors can be given access to

We have been onboarding several customers who are excited to be hosted in our system, and we’d be more than happy to demonstrate or give a free demo access for those who would like to try it out, you can email us on [email protected], drop us a message on LinkedIn, or book right into our calendar by clicking here: Bookings

Posted on by

BIVDA Member IVDeology excited to Sponsor 2025 IVDR Event

IVDeology are excited to announce our first sponsorship of a BIVDA event, the 2025 annual 2-day IVDR Seminar hosted in Birmingham, UK! The event runs the 11th & 12th of February in person.

The ‘British in vitro Diagnostics Association’ (BIVDA) was formed in 1992 and operates from offices in central London. BIVDA is the national association for the IVD industry, including distributors and manufacturers, representing 97% of the market and nearly 250 organisations, with new members joining regularly.

IVDeology have been members of BIVDA for several years, as well as our Co-founder and MD Stuart Angell chairing the Regulatory Affairs working party. BIVDA has been an integral and very important part of IVDeology, allowing the networking and opportunity to collaborate with other IVD professionals, from consultants to Notified Body members, to business owners and others alike.

Being a British IVD consultancy and support team, we knew BIVDA would be the ideal membership for IVDeology, connecting us with specialists in the industry and keeping up to date with legislations and regulations. Membership allows IVDeology access to a board of expert members looking to shape and navigate the regulatory landscape.

And that is a big part of IVDeology and our journey too! Helping our customers navigate the ever-changing regulatory landscape, but helping you learn along the way.

We love being part of a voice for the British diagnostics industry, and our goal is to support those wanting to change and improve lives of patients. So, we are excited to not only be attending the BIVDA Regulatory affairs seminar once again but sponsoring the event too!

What can you expect during the 2 day seminar?

Members will be attend sessions providing detailed and expert opinion and guidance on regulatory topics, with key speakers from the field including:

  • Strategy plan and update for 2025 from BIVDA for it’s members
  • Key note speakers and panel discussions from IVD expert specialists with time for Q&A
  • Recap of 2024 and looking at 2025 activity for the UK IVD industry and what to expect
  • Workshops and break out sessions regarding hot industry topics
  • … and much, more more!

We have several of our IVDeology members attending the event and would be more than happy to chat with you about all things IVD! So please look out for us.

And if you have any questions about becoming a BIVDA member or registering for the event, you can reach out to us at [email protected], or directly to BIVDA at [email protected] or register for tickets at Annual Regulatory Affairs Seminar (2 Day event) Tickets, Tue 11 Feb 2025 at 10:00 | Eventbrite

Or if you’d like to discuss any regulatory compliance support, you can book right in with us via this link to speak to our friendly team

Posted on by

Apply for the MedTech Accelerator: Rapid Regulatory Support Fund 2024

On the 9th October 2024, it was announced that on behalf of the UK Government’s Office for Life Sciences, CPI has created the MedTech Accelerator for companies to apply for up to £30,000 of funding. An exciting opportunity for companies to lean into extra support which is most likely critical for progression of their product compliance journey.

What is the MedTech Accelerator?

It has been developed to help small and medium-sized business to navigate the complex and ever-changing MedTech regulatory landscape and for those who rely on external expertise to develop, commercialise and register life-changing products onto the market, to allow reduction on NHS services and improve patient safety.

This comes after the HealthTech Regulatory Innovation program (HealthTRIP) funded by Innovate UK back in 2022, which similarly help support SMEs overcome regulatory challenges but also hurdles that come along within Quality assurance. The programme awarded 277 companies.

Who is the Accelerator for?

The funding is aimed at UK SMEs developing or offering medical device (including Software as a Medical Device) and diagnostics (including IVD) products or services. Although pharmaceutical products are not considered eligible under this programme, combination medical products such as drug delivery devices would be considered eligible. If you are not sure if your product is eligible, you can reach out to us here at IVDeology to discuss further and we’d be happy to chat.

Am I eligible?

Only UK-based SMEs are eligible to apply to this programme.  

  • Applications will only be accepted from and will be awarded to a single legal entity.  Only one application per company or company group is allowed.   
  • Applications must be from a UK registered SME company which is developing or currently producing and selling MedTech as they are outlined in the Medicines & Medical Devices Act 2021

You can find more information and links here: Eligibility | CPI (uk-cpi.com)

Why should I apply?

The regulatory landscape for MedTech is constantly changing, including a divergence between the UK and EU systems. This is leading to some UK companies finding their products no longer meet the regulatory requirements to be sold within the EU. The MedTech Accelerator: Rapid Regulatory Support fund aims to help SMEs overcome this barrier and hopefully reduce timelines, release financial tension, and encourage businesses to keep moving forward with their innovations and offer some expertise comfort, which is where IVDeology come in.

How do I apply?

Applications opened on Wednesday 9th October 2024, at 9am and close on Thursday 31st October 2024, at midday UK GMT.

CPI will review applications regularly, and if they receive 300 before the deadline, they will close applications early. Companies are, therefore, encouraged to apply as soon as they can as it is a first come first serve.

Please refer to the eligibility section above before proceeding with your application. The form can be downloaded and filled in here: MedTech Accelerator – Rapid Regulatory Support Fund (office.com)

Results Announced: by Friday 29th November 2024 but applications could be stopped earlier dependent on which is reached first, the 300 applicant limit or the date.

You said IVDeology can help – tell me more?

IVDeology have been dedicated to supporting companies of all sizes with their compliance journey since we began in 2018, and regulatory affairs is a HUGE part of that. But we especially understand the strains and challenges SME companies face, starting with design and innovation to regulatory challenges, getting on the market and actually staying there.

We have played a big part in some of our customers funding journey, including a company that applied for the 2022 HealthTRIP innovation grant (as previously mentioned) and used our services to support and perform the following:

  • Regulatory Health Assessment: this allowed us to find any gaps but also strengths within their design and development of the device and highlight areas best to support including being able to put together a regulatory roadmap
    • A gap assessment: this allowed us to review all processes and controls, including technical documentation for Quality assurance as well as regulatory
    • Workshop training sessions: this allowed us to work closely with the team to not only present the work and support, but allow learning opportunities around requirements and what they mean personally to their business
    • Q&A sessions: This allowed focused time with the customer and IVDeology to present any questions, raise any queries and catch up sessions to discuss the outcomes of the workshop sessions
    • Additional support hours: this allowed us to have dedicated time with the customer to work on any additional support that we may have highlighted in the gap assessments, including developing regulatory templates and processes including design and risk management (ISO14971)
    • A draft of a Clinical Evaluation/Performance Evaluation procedure (PER)

IVDeology are here to support you at any stage of your journey. We’re committed to putting time with our customers to understand where you are personally. We can find the gaps and identify the challenges, use our time and your funding wisely with implementing a regulatory strategy from the beginning for clarity, and work with you in a way that supports both your regs needs, but also supporting you with implementing a real working Quality management system (QMS).

We’re happy to work with you in a format that suits you best, from regular supporting hours to training and workshops, and if you’re not sure how best to decide, we’d be more than happy to book in some time to discuss what would work best for you, your team and your business.

We’re excited to see you apply, and we’ll be here to chat with you about supporting this next leg of your compliance journey. You can get in touch with us via LinkedIn, email on [email protected] or simply book time into our calendar here

Written by Casey Sedgwick, IVDeology Customer Success and Marketing Coordinator

Posted on by

Regulatory Strategy: What is it, and why do you need one?

If you are planning to place an in vitro diagnostic medical device (IVD) onto the market, It is critically important that you consider your regulatory strategy at the earliest opportunity. In our experience, building an effective strategy for regulatory strategy can be the difference between achieving product market access or not.

What is a Regulatory Strategy?

A Regulatory Strategy is a documented plan of all regulatory activities and deliverables that are required to be performed by a Legal Manufacturer. It should also align with the overall objectives of your organisation as defined within your vision, mission and business plan.

This should lay out a framework for placing an IVD on the market or markets depending on your commercial opportunity. Typically, the organisation will identify a priority list of countries where it is intending to sell the devices, the regulatory strategy describes the order of which these countries are being registered in.

Once the device is on the market, the plan continues to drive the regulatory surveillance mechanisms described as part of Post Market Surveillance as part of your ISO 13485 Quality Management System. It should also include a plan for meeting any transitions to updated regulatory requirements or ISO standards associated with the device.

Why do you need one?

For devices being placed on the European market under European IVD Regulation (IVDR), Article 10 (Manufacturers Obligations) describes the requirement for maintaining a regulatory strategy:

The quality management system shall address at least the following aspects:

(a) a strategy for regulatory compliance, including compliance with conformity assessment procedures and procedures for management of modifications to the devices covered by the system;

Furthermore, Annex IX requires the Quality Management System to include within its procedures, “a strategy for regulatory compliance, including processes for identification of relevant legal requirements, qualification, classification, handling of equivalence, choice of, and compliance with, conformity assessment procedures.”

In addition to the regulatory expectations, it is also hugely beneficial to plan and document the path to device registration and beyond. It also offers clear evidence to investors that the route to market has been considered and is planned.

When should you create one?

Typically, the regulatory strategy is formed, at a basic level, early on within the design and development process. Once your business vision and mission has been identified, and your business plan establishes the potential for the development of an IVD, the route to achieving that vision should now be considered.

Developing a regulatory strategy is an iterative process as many of the elements required will not have been considered or nailed down. This is entirely normal, but it is important to do the groundwork and start somewhere!

Our Approach to Regulatory Strategy

Education of the basic IVD requirements

A regulatory strategy can take many forms and will grow as you progress through the D&D process. We prefer to work with our SME customers and provide a regulatory strategy blended with some in-house training (virtually or on your site globally) on the key IMDRF principles, definitions and concepts of the regulation of IVDs. We aim to cover the main markets notably the EU, UK and MDSAP countries, to give you the best possible start in understanding what you need to know before developing your device.

Evaluate device type and classification and routes to market

Using your existing ideas of what your device is, and how it should be used, we can help you construct an Intended Purpose Statement, which is the bedrock of how IVDs are classified and assessed. We will guide you through how to assign device nomenclature including GMDN or EMDN codes to understand the routes for conformity assessment and submission requirements, EU Notified Bodies or UK Approved bodies as required. The output of this evaluation will be detailed within a Regulatory Strategy Report, which you can share with your wider team and investors.

The strategy should sit alongside the Quality Plan, used to identify and plan the implementation of a Quality Management System (QMS).

End to end planning

We can incorporate our knowledge to help you understand an estimation of design and development stages with associated costs. This will help you identify when you need to grow and when to secure additional funding. Our experience however is that bringing an IVD to is never a straight line and your regulatory strategy may change over time. We can give you the background knowledge and tools along the way to navigate the complexities and challenges that you may face.

Be part of the journey with you

As part of the Abingdon Health group, IVDeology can spend time with you to understand, explain and build your regulatory strategy together that works towards your timelines and business project goals, but not only that, we can work together as a strong technical team with your business to support any gaps you may need. IVDeology building your regulatory plan with you means you always have a supportive hand for any questions, queries or concerns every step of the way with a team who knows your goals and vision.

If you’d like to discuss a regulatory plan, whether you have an existing one already or starting from scratch, you can book a call here, or email us on [email protected] and we’d be happy to help!

Posted on by

US IVD Classification – How different can it be?

IVDeology have decades of IVD (invitro diagnostics) compliance support experience within the Quality and regulatory industry, with backgrounds from microbiology to lab based experience, and recently becoming part of the Abingdon Health PLC to offer a more holistic range of services from cradle to grave of diagnostic products. Co-founder and Director of training Nancy Consterdine talks about the US classifications of devices, having worked recently with US 510K submissions including pre-submissions.

The Global Harmonisation Task Force (GHTF) published their classification guidance in June 2006 proposing a risk based, 4 tier classification system for In Vitro Diagnostic Devices. This guidance has been widely used since 2006 for new regulatory systems being set up around the world e.g. the IVD Regulation in Europe 2017/746.

However, the United States of America (US) had already introduced a 3-tier risk-based classification system back in 1976 with the amendments to the Food, Drug and Cosmetics act (FD&C) to include medical devices. This system has now been in place for 48 years, despite amendments having been made around the regulatory pathways e.g. introduction of the 510K De Novo program, enacting of the Small Business Determination program and electronic submission processes. So, how does the classification system work currently and what are the future changes that the FDA are proposing?

Figure above shows class |, || and ||| and risk (explained below)

Class 1

  • Low to Moderate Risk devices e.g. Transport culture medium, immunoelectrophoretic equipment, Biological stains
  • Subject to General Controls (Regulatory Requirements which apply to all medical devices) all covered under a quality management system:

    – Registration of producers of medical devices.
    – Notifications and other remedies e.g. recall.
    – Records and reports on devices e.g. adverse event report.
  • Manufacturers are still visible to FDA and may be subject to audit.
  • Devices may be exempted from a General Control as stated in the classification regulation for that device e.g. they may be exempt from GMP other than keeping records and complaint files.
  • Devices are submitted via the 510K pre-market notification process but some are exempt.

Class II

  • Moderate to High Risk e.g. Blood Culture Assay, Rubella ELISA Test
  • Subject to General Controls and Special Controls:
    – Device specific
    – Evidence of meeting performance standards
    – Post market surveillance
    – Adherence to guidelines
    – Special labelling requirement
  • General Controls are considered insufficient to provide assurance of safety and effectiveness.
  • Devices are submitted for pre-market notification via 510K process.

Class III

  • High Risk e.g. Cancer Biomarker companion diagnostic assay
  • Subject to General Controls and Premarket Approval:
    – Quality Management processes and controls
    – Software design, development and cyber security
    – Analytical Verification data
    – Clinical Performance Data
  • Pre-Market Approval (PMA) application is required

Recent Developments

In January 2024, a press release from Jeff Shuren, the director of the Centre for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) announced the intent to initiate the reclassification process for most IVDs which are currently class III (high risk) into class II (moderate risk). They identified that the majority of these tests are infectious disease and companion diagnostic IVDs. This is in line with the FDA least burdensome approach allowing manufacturers of some devices to seek marketing clearance through the 510K premarket notification route. In the release it also talked to the FDA desire to encourage more manufacturers to develop the test and in turn increase competition and access to these important tests.

The process of reclassification has already started with a panel meeting in September 2023 identifying 3 types of infectious disease diagnostic IVDs

  • Nucleic acid and serology based IVDs to aid diagnosis of Hepatitis B Virus infection and management of infected patients.
  • Serology based IVDs for detection of human parvovirus B19.
  • Cell mediated immune reactivity IVDs to aid identification of in vitro responses to peptide antigens associated with TB infection.

Conclusion

The IVD industry can only welcome these moves by the FDA in conjunction with the amendment of the Quality Management System regulation (QMS) to be more closely aligned to the ISO 13485:2016 standard. It makes the USA a far more inviting prospect for initial market authorisation applications. The costs are transparent, the timelines are clearly identified and there is a process in place to present and discuss the device with the FDA in a pre-submission meeting.

There are however other considerations that need to be taken, Jeff Shuren has recently announced his retirement and Dr Michelle Tarver will assume the role of CDRH Acting Director. Also, there are presidential elections this year, will these changes impact the current trajectory of the CHRH? We at IVDeology will continue to monitor the situation across the pond, it is evident that since Brexit the UK government has been eager to foster recognition of other regulatory body approvals and it does feel that the movement of the FDA approval process is going in the same direction as that of the UK MDR.

Next steps to consider, and how we can help.

IVDeology Ltd can support with all of the above, please contact us for a friendly conversation to identify how we can support you with your compliance journey via our contact page

Posted on by

MDSAP: Explaining the complexities and importance

The Medical Device Single Audit Programme (MDSAP) is a system by which the participant competent authorities to recognise the quality management certification (as awarded after audit against both ISO 13485 and county specific requirements) from a single authority for medical device and in-vitro diagnostic medical device (IVDs) legal manufacturers.

The programme has been established by the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) and is intended to provide a harmonised approach to demonstrating the compliance of the Quality Management System (QMS) using a globally recognised approach.

The MDSAP was developed by the IMDRF to:

  • Enable appropriate regulatory oversight of medical device manufacturers’ quality management systems while minimizing regulatory burden on industry;
  • Promote more efficient and flexible use of regulatory resources through work sharing and mutual acceptance among regulators while respecting the sovereignty of each authority;
  • Promote globally, in the longer term, a greater alignment of regulatory approaches and technical requirements based on international standards and best practices;
  • Promote consistency, predictability and transparency of regulatory programs by standardizing;

    1. the practices and procedures of participating regulators for the oversight of third party auditing organizations, and
    2. the practices and procedures of participating third party auditing organizations

Regulatory Authorities

MDSAP consists of Regulatory Authority Council Members, Observers and Affiliate members:

Regulatory Authority Council Members:

  • Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia
  • Brazil’s Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária
  • Health Canada
  • Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration

The RAC is the decision-making body of MDSAP and consists of representatives from all regulatory authorities that are members of the RAC. The RAC provides direction, oversight, and resources to support the MDSAP development, implementation, maintenance, and expansion.

Observer Members:

  • European Union (EU)
  • Singapore’s Health Sciences Authority (HSA) (NEW)
  • United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
  • The World Health Organization (WHO) Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs) Programme

The observers do not observe RAC members and do not attend RAC meetings, but they do observe and contribute the RAC activities. Both the EU and UK have been Observers for over 2 years, and as such, can apply to become full RAC members if desired.

Affiliate Members:

  • Argentina’s National Administration of Drugs, Foods and Medical Devices (ANMAT)
  • Ministry of Health of Israel
  • Kenya’s Pharmacy and Poisons Board (New member)
  • Republic of Korea’s Ministry of Food and Drug Safety
  • Federal Commission for Protection from Sanitary Risks (COFEPRIS) of Mexico
  • TFDA – Taiwan Food and Drug Administration

Affiliate members are not members of the RAC or an Official Observer, but engages in MDSAP, demonstrates understanding of MDSAP and utilizes MDSAP audit reports and MDSAP certificates for evaluating compliance with applicable medical device requirements, including a manufacturer’s quality management system, under the Affiliate Member’s regulatory framework.

The application of the MDSAP Programme

The utilisation of the MDSAP programme, and the resulting certificates are utilised differently depending on each Competent Authority as dedicated by each regional requirement.

Regulatory AuthorityUtilisation of MDSAP
AustraliaMDSAP audit report is used as part of the evidence that it has assessed for compliance with medical device market authorization requirements, unless excluded or exempt from these requirements.
BrazilANVISA utilizes the outcomes of the program as part of the pre-market and post market assessment.  
CanadaManufacturers intending to place a product on the market in Canada must have an MDSAP Certification issued by an Auditing Organization.
JapanThe Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) and Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) utilize these audit reports in pre-market and post-market audits.
United StatesU.S. FDA will accept the MDSAP audit reports as a substitute for FDA routine inspections under a 510(k) device application. The use of MDSAP is not utilised for pre-approval or post-approval inspections for Pre-Market Approval (PMA) applications.

The regulations for the above Regulatory Authorities are available (English) from the USA FDA Website.

The use of the MDSAP programme and certification will be greater utilised as he programme expands and more regulatory authorities recognise the value in this process.

The MDSAP Audit Cycle and Auditing Organisations

Auditing Organisation are certification bodies that have successfully applied, and been recognised by the MDSAP programme to audit medical device manufacturers against the requirements of the MDSAP programme. The current list includes many European Notified Bodies (under EU IVDR), and UK Approved Bodies (under UKCA) and are globally recognised.

The MDSAP audit is typically build on to the existing ISO 13485 certification audit of the Quality Management System with a 3-year audit cycle.

Figure 1 MDSAP Certification Cycle

Will MDSAP come to the EU and UK?

There is much talk regarding the use of MDSAP by the EU and UK. While I am a strong advocate in global harmonisation, the existing members joined MDSAP to find a harmonised way to create a robust process for standardising QMS requirements from a position where they needed to find a suitable and robust process. Regardless of the state of play in the EU and UK, both regions already have robust mechanisms for the surveillance of ISO 13485, largely provided by the technical and commercial expertise of EU and UK Notified Bodies and Approved Bodies (as part of ISO13485 certification/IVDR conformity assessment), so the utilising MDSAP would be less impactful.

The opportunity would be regarding the outward facing regulatory convergence of EU and UK to align, and reduce burden for accessing other markets, MDSAP would be a good way of doing this. We have seen TGA become well placed in MDSAP/IMDRF mainly utilising CE marking for supporting AUS market access.

The challenge with MDSAP is that each jurisdiction has specific requirements, which make the MDSAP process clunky. The key to an improved model is to remove local requirements as much as possible, however this is dependent on global alignment at a political as well as regulatory level.

References

If you’d like to discuss MDSAP with us, you can book a call with the IVDeology team as we navigate this new programme and what it means for you as a manufacturer or provider of IVD’s and devices with each of the individual requirements. Being part of BIVDA (British In Vitro Diagnostics association), we’re in a great position to be able to receive and understand information and distribute to our networks as it comes, in a reliable and digestible way.

Or if you’d like support in other areas of Quality assurance or regulatory compliance, we’d be happy to chat with you. We can support with Quality management system implementation, transfer or uplifting.

We’ll be keeping you up to date with MDSAP news on our LinkedIn page and website, so do follow up on our socials and keep up to date with IVDeology along with Abingdon Health PLC.

Written by Stuart Angell, MD and Co-founder of IVDeology and IVDeology UKRP